Syntes også den var virkelig spændende, så den 2 gange over et par dage..
Sad så og læste om den rundt omring på diverse forummer hvor jeg gentagne gange faldt over at største delen af det der har med religion at gøre - ikke holder en meter.. Kan ikke komme med nogle kilder på at det er forkert, men her er nogle citater fra folk der påstår at mange af filmens Religions part "facts" ikke holder vand.
Citat:
Well known fact that Jesus wasn't born on the 25th, which throws out the winter solstice,the southern crux wasn't named til 1501 because prior to that it was always thought to be part of centaurus.
Citat:
Horus's mother did not begin with M nor have the claim of a virgin,according to text on the 15th of November in a swamp was when horus was born, with no wise men(neither did Jesus they came to his home,not the manger)Horus never was baptized or taught in a temple
There are many more false parrallels between Jesus and Horus, but I will not waste my time with them, All The Zeitgist movie's religion segment is a bunch of poorly researched information that seems factual and logical until you do the research yourself
Citat:
Religious errors:
--"Christianity" did not "start" with Jesus. It has been from Creation. This is continuously used as "evidence" that Christianity was borrowed, but anyone who has ever read a Bible will know that God pre-dates pagan copies.
--The "15 century" bit about the similarity between Egyptian Gods and Jesus, happened during the captivity of the Israelites. This would suggest a copy of Christianity by the Egyptians, not the other way around.
--Sargon's rescue story is not the same as Moses', and the story given by the movie appears to be partially incorrect. The movie also ignores the mountain of evidence that supports Moses and the Exodus.
--"Easter" and "Christmas" are pagan; it is incorrect to group them with Biblical terms.
--"these people believe that the Earth is 12,000 years old" = False. Cut that in about half.
--Joseph was not born "miraculously" in the sense of virgin birth.
--"Age of 30" is not described in Scripture as the correct age for Jesus, we can only go with human estimates. The "parallels" between Joseph and Jesus are either incorrect, or a number that God uses often (12).
Citat:
Astronomy errors:
--Sirius and Orion's belt line up somewhat, but the sun is nowhere near this line on December 25th.
--The Southern Cross is also nowhere near the sun at ANY time of the year.
--The Sun does NOT move 1 degree north all of a sudden on December 25th. The transition is gradual and much smaller.
--The "half-earth" thing at Spring is a total joke. The sun covers half of the earth at all times of the year. Only the location of the sunlight moves.
--The "wobble" shown of the Earth regarding precession is in the wrong direction.
--The dates given (2150 years) for the precession is an often incorrect estimate. This number varies widely. The equinox will occur with the Sun in Pisces until somewhere between A.D. 2600-2700. Aquarius' "age" lasts from 2600-2700 until 4400-4500.
--The dates for Taurus and Aries are incorrect again. The "age" of Aries starts around 1850 B.C., not 2150. The Exodus was in the 1400s B.C., so this doesn't correlate.
--Although the "age" of Pisces starts in A.D. 1, Jesus was born around 4 B.C. instead, while Herod was still alive. The movie doesn't mention this but instead silently uses the "A.D. 1" as a smokescreen hoping that people believe that the dates match up. Astrology is on its own.
Who ever compiled the astronomy and religious side of things must not have done their homework. Very poor performance so far.
(props til random forum posters)
Nå, men udover Religions parten syntes jeg at filmen var rigtig interresant og skræmmende, alle skulle se den!!