Psychedelia.dk

En lidt humoristisk, og ret skraemmende maaske artikel.
Fra http://www.family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0034603.cfm

November 19, 2004

Porn Like Heroin in the Brain
by Stuart Shepard, correspondent

Senate committee discusses pornography and the First Amendment.

Experts on pornography's effects on brain chemistry testified at a Senate hearing this week where a key point of discussion was whether porn is a form of speech protected by the First Amendment or addictive material that should be unlawful.

Psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover described how pornography is analogous to cigarettes, noting that "it is a very carefully designed delivery system for evoking a tremendous flood within the brain of endogenous opioids."

It's time, he added, to stop regarding it as simply a form of expression.

"Modern science," Satinover said, "allows us to understand that the underlying nature of an addiction to pornography is chemically nearly identical to a heroin addiction."

Dr. Mary Anne Layden with the Center for Cognitive Therapy at the University of Pennsylvania explained how a pornographic image is burned into the brain's pathways.

"That image is in your brain forever," she explained. "If that was an addictive substance, you, at any point for the rest of your life, could in a nanosecond draw it up."

Dr. Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education, called on the Senate to take action against pornography, saying it's time to mandate that law enforcement begin to collect all data and pornographic materials found in the possession of anyone involved in criminal activity.

Doing so, she added, would yield data showing whether pornography is being used as a how-to manual for sex crimes.

"The evidence the panelists presented showed an overwhelming harm from pornography," said Daniel Weiss, media and sexuality analyst with Focus on the Family.

He hopes the Senate will turn the evidence into action.

TAKE ACTION/FOR MORE INFORMATION
If you think Congress should be taking serious action against pornography, you can start by thanking Sen. Sam Brownback for calling the hearing, then contact your representatives in Congress and let them know what you think. For help in contacting your elected representatives, please see our CitizenLink Action Center.

Also, to learn more about one person's struggles with pornography, we suggest the resource "An Affair of the Mind: One Woman's Courageous Battle to Salvage Her Family From the Devastation of Pornography." Author Laurie Hall shares her courageous struggle to protect herself and two children from her husband's addiction to pornography.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Et godt eksempel paa "talking out of the ass"

_________________

Meget mærkeligt. Jeg har tidligere læst et transcript hvor hun blev citeret for "crack cocain" og slet ikke heroin. Jeg tror family.org har fået noget galt i halsen da de skrev det.

Og så vil jeg slet ikke komme ind på beskyldningerne her!

Det er vel et meget godt argument at hive frem hvis man skulle komme ud for en diskussion om hvorvidt legalisering af psychoactive stoffer har noget med tankefriheden at gøre eller ej. Hvis man kan argumentere for at forbyde pornografi med baggrund i dens indflydelse på hjernen, hvad kan man så ikke forbyde? Morten Korch? Højsangen? Eller Shakespeare?

Så lige noget om det på BBC. Tilsyneladende er der en del, der faktisk er afhængige af internetporno. Jeg, derimod, har kun onaneret til internetporno een gang, og jeg fik bestemt ikke udløsning*.



Nu er stikordet jo heroinagtig virkning på hjernen, og det har Morten Korch ikke (på de fleste, i hvert fald). Af den grund kan man sagtens argumentere for, at internetporno skal forbydes - uden at det har noget med de andre ting, du nævner, at gøre.