| Psychedelia.dk https://psychedelia.dk/forum/ |
|
| Blogs https://psychedelia.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=29654 |
Side 1 af 1 |
| Forfatter: | jim fear [ 13 sep 2009 22:46 ] |
| Titel: | Blogs |
Hej nørder Hvad er jeres yndlingsblogs (indenfor naturvidenskab)? List dem her! I min google reader findes følgende; Kemi: http://pipeline.corante.com/ - den bedste blog om medicinalkemi og industrien, utrolig velskrevet http://www.coronene.com/blog/ - organisk kemi blog, ikke så seriøs men meget interessant http://curlyarrow.blogspot.com/ - organisk kemi blog kørt af en dansker, ret spændende men opdateres ikke så tit http://totallysynthetic.com/blog/ - hardcore organisk syntese blog med fokus på strategier og analyse Ernæring: http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/ - en god og kontroversiel blog om ernæring skrevet af en fyr der får 80% af sine kalorier fra fedt http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/ - blog om ernæring og sygdom af en amerikansk phd. med. |
|
| Forfatter: | Booty-Lone [ 26 sep 2009 00:17 ] |
| Titel: | Re: Blogs |
hey jim! tak skal du have for al den fine info du linker til. jeg sidder lige nu og læser på wholehealth... og den er rigtig interessant. jeg håber jeg snart kan byde ind med nogle stykker. skal bare lige finde dem først.. Edit: http://heartscanblog.blogspot.com jeg kan specielt godt li den her: What do you think of these chains of logic? Cyanide is a potent lethal poison; carbon monoxide is a less lethal poison. Therefore: plenty of carbon monoxide is good. Having uterine cancer is a bad thing. Having uterine fibroids is a less bad thing. Therefore: plenty of uterine fibroids are good. These are obvious examples of seriously flawed logic. Students of logic and philosophy will recognize the above erroneous sequences as examples of the twisted arguments often used to persuade an argumentative opponent of the logic of a premise. As long ago as 335 B.C., Greek philosopher, Aristotle, recognized the pitfalls of thinking in such arguments. You think we’d know better by now. Try this one: White enriched flour is a bad for health; whole grains are less bad for health. Therefore: plenty of whole grains are good for health. Ouch! In the 1960s, we all ate hot dogs on white buns, white flour Wonder Bread® sandwiches, Mom made cookies and cupcakes with white flour. Then, during the 1970s and 1980s, clinical studies were performed demonstrating that whole wheat and whole grains reduced colon cancer, high blood pressure, diabetes, and heart disease compared to white flour. In other words, add back fiber and B vitamins and health benefits develop: No argument here. Therefore: whole grains must be good for health. Further, lots of whole grains⎯unlimited quantities of whole grains many times per day, every day⎯must be even better. Even the USDA says so on their nutrition pyramid, with 8-11 servings of grains per day, 4 of which should be whole grains, at the widest portion of the pyramid. But what happens when you follow this logic through and fill your diet with whole grains? Look around you and it’s easy to see: Appetite increases, people become obese, blood sugar increases, diabetes develops, HDL cholesterol plummets, triglycerides skyrocket, inflammatory patterns (e.g., c-reactive protein, or CRP) increase, small LDL (the number one cause for heart disease in the obese U.S.!) shoots through the roof. I would no more fill my diet with “healthy whole grains” than I would close my garage door with the car running. |
|
| Forfatter: | xun [ 26 sep 2009 19:29 ] |
| Titel: | Re: Blogs |
Nanotech: http://www.nanotechblog.org/ http://www.nanotechnologydevelopment.com/ http://crnano.typepad.com/ |
|
| Side 1 af 1 | Alle tider er UTC + 1 time [DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|